Peak oil review – April 23
A weekly roundup of peak oil news, including:
-Oil and the global economy
-the Iranian confrontation
-the EU’s debt crisis
-Argentina nationalizes YPF
-Quote of the week
-Briefs
A weekly roundup of peak oil news, including:
-Oil and the global economy
-the Iranian confrontation
-the EU’s debt crisis
-Argentina nationalizes YPF
-Quote of the week
-Briefs
Out of desperation for the climate, many prominent environmentalists converted to the religion of nuclear (fission) power between 2008-2011. Maybe this is a good time to rethink those deathbed conversions.
A midweekly roundup of peak oil news, including:
-Developments this week
It’s a policy fierce enough to cause great suffering among Iranians — and possibly in the long run among Americans, too. It might, in the end, even deeply harm the global economy and yet, history tells us, it will fail on its own. Economic war led by Washington (and encouraged by Israel) will not take down the Iranian government or bring it to the bargaining table on its knees ready to surrender its nuclear program. It might, however, lead to actual armed conflict with incalculable consequences.
A midweekly roundup of peak oil news, including:
-Developments this week
We have a new report from Warren Karlenzig, who just toured Japan with a United Nations group. As the founder of Common Current, Warren advises city and national governments on sustainability. He’s a Fellow of the Post Carbon Institute.
A weekly roundup of peak oil news, including:
-Oil and the global economy
-The Iranian confrontation
-Gasoline
-U.S. pipelines
-Quote of the week
-Briefs
While awareness of peak oil has advanced light years since ODAC was founded over a decade ago, on the evidence of this week the same cannot be said for the conduct of British energy policy. Back in 2000, Tony Blair’s government was blindsided by petrol protests that brought the country to a standstill in 48 hours. Mr Blair bore the scars, and while there was much to criticise in New Labour’s energy policy—not least the invasion of Iraq—he developed emergency plans and did not allow a serious recurrence…
-Why baseload power is doomed
-For New Generation of Power Plants, a New Emission Rule From the E.P.A.
-Germany’s $263 Billion Renewables Shift Biggest Since War
-Renewables LinkedIn to growth surge
-Japan faces nuclear-free summer, power shortage risks
Fusion based on hot plasmas – the “tokamak” technology – is progressing at a very slow rate: the first energy producing plants are planned to appear not earlier than in several decades from now (if ever). There is an unwritten law that rules industrial research and development. It says that you have to demonstrate that your idea can work in no more than three years. If a project produces no useful results in five years, then there are good chances that it never will.
Rising geopolitical tensions and high oil prices are continuing to help renewable energy find favour amongst investors and politicians. Yet how much faith should we place in renewables to make up the shortfall in fossil fuels? Can science really solve our energy problems, and which sectors offers the best hope for our energy future? To help us get to the bottom of this we spoke with energy specialist Dr. Tom Murphy, an associate professor of physics at the University of California. Tom runs the popular energy blog Do the Math which takes an astrophysicist’s-eye view of societal issues relating to energy production, climate change, and economic growth.
I thought I’d do a thought experiment. Suppose tomorrow morning a hypothetical university—let’s call it T.I.M.—sends out their weekly press release claiming a “revolutionary breakthrough” that will change the way we think about energy. Unlike every other time in the past decade they’ve made this claim, though, suppose this time it’s actually true: they’ve discovered a way of producing extremely cheap energy—as near to “free energy” as can be imagined.